my son asked my wife today/yesterday if the above is true. i'm not sure if he knows this is just the line from a pop song or not. he knows the song's hook, but i'm not sure if he realizes it is pretty much a hook more so than a truism.
songs like that used to make me cry when i was a kid. i guess that was part of my depression. that could be a stretch. maybe i was just an emotional kid. i honestly don't know. either way, i remember certain songs used to make me bawl when i was a young buck. shit, now i hardly cry at all. oddly, sometimes when i listen to a golden era banger, i can tear up, but that is still a rare occasion. also, it isn't for quite the same reasons. hip hop is like blah blah now, so sometimes when i hear a classic jam, it reminds me that shit will not likely ever be that dope again. imagine going from It Takes A Nation Of Millions to The Massacre. WTF! that's not a smooth transition at all. i'm not a Pac fan but i have more respect for that bo' than Curtis. blah, blah, blah.
anyways, back to 1 being lonely. fuck, i don't know if that is true or not. why isn't 0 the lonliest? at least 1 is 1. 0 is nothing. what could possibly be lonlier than 0? it's not like you can have less than 0 friends/associates/aquaintences. so maybe 0 is the lonliest number.
make like i didn't just try to kill my sinus headache w/5 shots...
PEACE
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment